Skip to content | Change text size
Online PublicationsResources
 

Faculty editor resources

Using standard layouts for course structure/requirements

Course structures/requirements are presented in the handbooks in a number of ways, including, but not confined to the following:

  • a statement such as “Students must complete any two level five units offered by the faculty…”
  • simple list of the required units (this may also include a statement such as “or any other unit offered in/by the faculty”)
  • list of required units delineated by various combinations of year, semester, core units and electives
  • series of statements of rules and restrictions, with or without specified units
  • statement of a sequence of units to be studied.

Furthermore, any of the above may be duplicated under campus/discipline/stream etc subheadings within the Course structure/Course requirements entry.

Be unambiguous and consistent:

  • Course structure and requirements statements must be unambiguous as this is the core of the university’s legal ‘contract’ with the student.
  • Whichever layouts for course structures/requirements are used by a faculty, they must be applied consistently to all courses with similar structure.

Standards for listing requirements

List specific units in alpha-numeric order before ‘option’ statements (eg 6 points of arts units) and in order of increase, eg “6 points of arts units; 12 points of science electives”. An example is outlined below:

Year 1

  • ABC1234 Title of unit
  • ABC2345 Title of unit
  • BCD1234 Title of unit
  • BCD2345 Title of unit
  • 6 points of arts units
  • 6 points of law units
  • 12 points of science electives

Courses with multiple campus/discipline/stream etc variations

Examples from the 2007 handbook of different layouts for courses with multiple divisions within the course structure/requirments fields include the following: